From first discovery to final result.
Follow a small business through a complete example tender. This is a learning scenario, with no claimed real-world success story.
- Find
- Check
- Prepare
- Submit
- Learn
- 01
Find a suitable opportunity
A fictional small cleaning team finds an office-building contract. It is new to public procurement but has relevant experience. It checks the scope, working hours, location and actual minimum requirements.
- 02
Turn documents into a plan
The team records each requirement in a matrix: source location, evidence, owner and internal deadline. Missing or unclear items become visible early. One uncertainty is clarified in time through the designated channel.
- 03
Offer an understandable solution
The bid explains staffing and cover, quality checks and complaint handling exactly where the fictional quality criteria request them. Prices and scope are checked together.
- 04
Transmit the tender correctly
The required portal access and form are tested early. After final review, the right files are uploaded and formal submission is completed. The team checks and saves the transmission receipt.
- 05
Understand evaluation
We assume both example bids are compliant and their bidders eligible. The following fictional evaluation therefore considers only award criteria: 40% price and 60% quality. It does not predict any real contract outcome.
- 06
Act on the result
After an award, the team confirms mobilisation, responsibilities and contractual obligations. After a loss, it records factual feedback and improves its process. It does not pretend to know a competitor’s confidential tender.
Illustrative example with 40% price and 60% quality. These weights and this formula are hypothetical.
| Bid | Price | Quality points | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | €10,000 | 80 / 100 | 88.00 |
| B | €11,000 | 95 / 100 | 93.36 |
Example price score = lowest bid price ÷ own bid price × 100. Total = price score × 0.40 + quality score × 0.60.
How do price and quality work together?
Change the values. Quality points are assumed learning values, not an AI prediction or a real evaluation. Quality weight is 100% minus price weight.
Price points = lowest price ÷ own price × 100. Total = price points × price weight + quality points × quality weight. Real procedures use only their own published criteria, formulas, rounding and minimum scores.
| Bid | Price points | Quality points | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | 100.00 | 80.00 | 88.00 |
| B | 90.91 | 95.00 | 93.36 |
Bid B leads in this example. Quality weight: 60.00%.
Five questions. More confidence.
No account, examination or assessment of your business. Choose an answer and read the explanation.
0/5 answered
Go to the original source
Editorially checked on 27 October 2026. The current original documents of your procedure govern.
- GWB §122 – EignungBundesministerium der Justiz / Bundesamt für Justiz
- VgV §58 – Zuschlag und ZuschlagskriterienBundesministerium der Justiz / Bundesamt für Justiz
Your knowledge. Your workspace.
Discover
Review opportunities and their source notices in one place.
Organise
Structure opportunities, tasks, evidence and responsibilities in the workspace.
Prepare
Work on requirements and bid drafts together, and review them yourself.
Submit correctly
Use the buyer’s submission channel. Vergabezone does not replace an official submission portal.
This entire guide remains freely accessible. Work tools are in the protected workspace; its access and pricing are separate.
Open workspace